<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Reading Group: Exchange &#124; Reading Group Post III</title>
	<link>http://thewinger.com/words/2007/the-reading-group-exchange/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: maia</title>
		<link>http://thewinger.com/words/2007/the-reading-group-exchange/#comment-6132</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewinger.com/words/2007/the-reading-group-exchange/#comment-6132</guid>
					<description>In a 2004 article - "Concept &#38; Presence" - Lepecki points out that the politics in this new 'movement' of dance is informed by a critique of visuality and a deep dialogue with performance theory. 

the performance theory part is quiete clear. Lepecki himself discusses this performances theory in various articles and also in "Exhausting Dance" - but what is this "critique of visuality" - excuse my ignorance - is it merely a critique of the gaze? i.e. the notion of commercial work as easy to look at? or does it go beyond that into something am just not seeing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a 2004 article - &#8220;Concept &amp; Presence&#8221; - Lepecki points out that the politics in this new &#8216;movement&#8217; of dance is informed by a critique of visuality and a deep dialogue with performance theory. </p>
<p>the performance theory part is quiete clear. Lepecki himself discusses this performances theory in various articles and also in &#8220;Exhausting Dance&#8221; - but what is this &#8220;critique of visuality&#8221; - excuse my ignorance - is it merely a critique of the gaze? i.e. the notion of commercial work as easy to look at? or does it go beyond that into something am just not seeing?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
