<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On my way to work&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: SanderO</title>
		<link>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22824</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22824</guid>
					<description>Architecture is a practical art.  It must function  as an environment to live, work, assemble whatever.  it should also work with its environment and be very much site specific.

There is nothing wrong with taking "modernist" approaches to the built environment and some of these efforts as sculpture and form can be and are stunning.  Their very success at form may make them less successful as functioning buildings.

I mentioned art galleries which often are displaying orthogonal art - paintings.  These often want spaces which do not compete visually, neither distract or alter the work of art. The Wright Guggenheim is a celebrated work of architecture, but not successful, in my opinion (and I am sure others) as a museum for displaying and viewing paintings.  Simply hanging a flat painting on a curvilinear wall is "jarring" to the eye, let alone the problem of having a wall and ceiling frame it which are not level.  The side galleries are "orthogonal" and work in the traditional manner.

The display of paintings is an example how what is touted as great architecture (for other reasons) can fail in some of its key mission.  The Gugg is a wonderful fun space, but as a museum I much prefer the Whitney or the very traditional Metropolitan Museum of Art.

The new MOMA is also stunning and very well configured to display modern art in exciting spaces.  It is a bit confusing to navigate, unlike the Gugg where you have but two choices - up the helix or down the helix.

Gehry is pushing boundaries of form, and he may have succeeded in a sculptural manner, but not entirely as an architect. My opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Architecture is a practical art.  It must function  as an environment to live, work, assemble whatever.  it should also work with its environment and be very much site specific.</p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with taking &#8220;modernist&#8221; approaches to the built environment and some of these efforts as sculpture and form can be and are stunning.  Their very success at form may make them less successful as functioning buildings.</p>
<p>I mentioned art galleries which often are displaying orthogonal art - paintings.  These often want spaces which do not compete visually, neither distract or alter the work of art. The Wright Guggenheim is a celebrated work of architecture, but not successful, in my opinion (and I am sure others) as a museum for displaying and viewing paintings.  Simply hanging a flat painting on a curvilinear wall is &#8220;jarring&#8221; to the eye, let alone the problem of having a wall and ceiling frame it which are not level.  The side galleries are &#8220;orthogonal&#8221; and work in the traditional manner.</p>
<p>The display of paintings is an example how what is touted as great architecture (for other reasons) can fail in some of its key mission.  The Gugg is a wonderful fun space, but as a museum I much prefer the Whitney or the very traditional Metropolitan Museum of Art.</p>
<p>The new MOMA is also stunning and very well configured to display modern art in exciting spaces.  It is a bit confusing to navigate, unlike the Gugg where you have but two choices - up the helix or down the helix.</p>
<p>Gehry is pushing boundaries of form, and he may have succeeded in a sculptural manner, but not entirely as an architect. My opinion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ITgirl</title>
		<link>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22815</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22815</guid>
					<description>I think its really surreal and beautiful -- A lot if this stuff is atrocious but in this instance it works -- rmeinds me of the sea... 

nice pics! thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its really surreal and beautiful &#8212; A lot if this stuff is atrocious but in this instance it works &#8212; rmeinds me of the sea&#8230; </p>
<p>nice pics! thanks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Emily H.</title>
		<link>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22805</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22805</guid>
					<description>I love buildings that are also pieces of art.  It takes a lot of talent to take something that must be functional and make it art as well.  I find these types of buildings to be rare in America - Europe seems to have more. Thanks for taking the pictures.  Love it!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love buildings that are also pieces of art.  It takes a lot of talent to take something that must be functional and make it art as well.  I find these types of buildings to be rare in America - Europe seems to have more. Thanks for taking the pictures.  Love it!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim Clyne</title>
		<link>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22792</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 03:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22792</guid>
					<description>Bernard, I'm curious about your opinions of other works of genius:

1. "Madame Bovary," Flaubert--a flabby blob?
2. "Rite of Spring," Stravinsky--a loud blob?
3. Isadora Duncan's solos--not an erotic enough blob?...
4. Divine Comedy, Dante
5. Chekhov's short stories
6. "Ulysses," James Joyce
7. The Iliad, Homer

Love your nom de plume--do you think you're some kind of god?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernard, I&#8217;m curious about your opinions of other works of genius:</p>
<p>1. &#8220;Madame Bovary,&#8221; Flaubert&#8211;a flabby blob?<br />
2. &#8220;Rite of Spring,&#8221; Stravinsky&#8211;a loud blob?<br />
3. Isadora Duncan&#8217;s solos&#8211;not an erotic enough blob?&#8230;<br />
4. Divine Comedy, Dante<br />
5. Chekhov&#8217;s short stories<br />
6. &#8220;Ulysses,&#8221; James Joyce<br />
7. The Iliad, Homer</p>
<p>Love your nom de plume&#8211;do you think you&#8217;re some kind of god?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bernard Profitendieu</title>
		<link>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22789</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22789</guid>
					<description>A metal blob that has been repeated in every city insecure enough to pony up the cash for the latest fad in architecture ... (but your pics are quite nice!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A metal blob that has been repeated in every city insecure enough to pony up the cash for the latest fad in architecture &#8230; (but your pics are quite nice!)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jennifer</title>
		<link>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22762</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22762</guid>
					<description>definitely looks better than the met opera facade :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definitely looks better than the met opera facade <img src='http://thewinger.com/words/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: softservegirl</title>
		<link>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22760</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22760</guid>
					<description>it's pure genius.  and a building that is designed as this one is flawless from every angle - you can't take a bad picture of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s pure genius.  and a building that is designed as this one is flawless from every angle - you can&#8217;t take a bad picture of it!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: QQ</title>
		<link>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22742</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 05:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22742</guid>
					<description>thanks David for an amazing performance this afternoon at the music center in LA! and esp. thanks for taking a picture with me on my cell using your "longer arm" :) you made my day! when are you coming back LA performing again?? i'll be there ...

i noticed the architecture too when i was walking to the music center. nice pictures. at 5:52 pm, i was just walking to my car driving home :)

good luck,
a fan of yours, always</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks David for an amazing performance this afternoon at the music center in LA! and esp. thanks for taking a picture with me on my cell using your &#8220;longer arm&#8221; <img src='http://thewinger.com/words/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  you made my day! when are you coming back LA performing again?? i&#8217;ll be there &#8230;</p>
<p>i noticed the architecture too when i was walking to the music center. nice pictures. at 5:52 pm, i was just walking to my car driving home <img src='http://thewinger.com/words/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>good luck,<br />
a fan of yours, always
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Art</title>
		<link>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22740</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22740</guid>
					<description>It's such a beautiful building to look at and photograph... for me the hall is so amazingly warm and wonderful to listen to music in that my impression of the outside is biased towards positive, just because I love going to concerts there.  Classical music in particular sounds so bright and immediate in that space, and the way the auditorium is laid out makes the concerts feel very democratic: no visual separation between seat sections, and the audience seated all around the stage, so it feels very communal inside.  

But it's a bummer that the outside of the building only really looks good from the Grand Avenue and 1st Street sides - I'm sure you noticed walking up from the South towards the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion that the administrative offices on the backside of the building make a giant biege wall with a few square windows on the surface.  And the wall is built so high that you only see the peaks of the metal if you're looking up at the building from the south.  It's such a jarring contrast to the free flowing metal everywhere else, an opportunity lost in my opinion.  

Still, the auditorium is so great that the function overwhelms any shortcomings outside.

So nice that you all were here in this neck of the woods for half a week.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s such a beautiful building to look at and photograph&#8230; for me the hall is so amazingly warm and wonderful to listen to music in that my impression of the outside is biased towards positive, just because I love going to concerts there.  Classical music in particular sounds so bright and immediate in that space, and the way the auditorium is laid out makes the concerts feel very democratic: no visual separation between seat sections, and the audience seated all around the stage, so it feels very communal inside.  </p>
<p>But it&#8217;s a bummer that the outside of the building only really looks good from the Grand Avenue and 1st Street sides - I&#8217;m sure you noticed walking up from the South towards the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion that the administrative offices on the backside of the building make a giant biege wall with a few square windows on the surface.  And the wall is built so high that you only see the peaks of the metal if you&#8217;re looking up at the building from the south.  It&#8217;s such a jarring contrast to the free flowing metal everywhere else, an opportunity lost in my opinion.  </p>
<p>Still, the auditorium is so great that the function overwhelms any shortcomings outside.</p>
<p>So nice that you all were here in this neck of the woods for half a week.  <img src='http://thewinger.com/words/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Philip</title>
		<link>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22736</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewinger.com/words/2008/on-my-way-to-work/#comment-22736</guid>
					<description>I don't know which I like more: the building or your photos of it! Excellent...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know which I like more: the building or your photos of it! Excellent&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
