January 21, 2008 at 12:10 am · Filed under dance, brooklyn, bam, MIKI, beckett, fiona shaw
Has now started.
Written in 1960, Samuel Beckett’s “Happy Days” was just wonderful to open the season.
Fabulous Fiona Shaw displayed a woman burried in the earth in two different times. She does not have much ‘body language’ since she is in the earth, up to the waist and then up to the head… was just incredible to see the changes. It is fully convincing.
I saw Shaw in “Media” a few years ago at the same theater. I can’t forget how she performed, and now I dance Media in MGDC, it was a great to see another production of the same story. Even though it was not dance, it gave me a lot to think about.
This play actually has 2 actors, but almost 95% is Shaw’s monologue.
1 and 1/2 hours!
I just loved it.
Recent Posts by miki orihara
November 19, 2007 at 4:22 am · Filed under SLOAN, dance, motorcycle, bam, new york, cedar lake, ohad naharin, iphone, batsheva, guggenheim, works & process, frank lloyd wright, gaga
>>Hey Matt, nice to see you (albeit extremely briefly) Thursday night at Batsheva at BAM.<<
Matt did such an elegant job of explaining the evening’s piece. Both my friends and I had seen Decadance at Cedar Lake (which I understood to be a compilation of a some of his more popular pieces over the years) and it was interesting to see how this evening had a different feel. A bit less theatrical I guess, and perhaps more focused on the movement.
Earlier in the week (Monday to be exact) I took Sophs on the bike (juicing the bike up for the ride cross-town, above) and we went to see Ohad Naharin and the Batsheva Dance Company at the Guggenheim’s Works & Process series.
Every time I go to a Works & Process event I am always blown away by what a great deal it is. The theater is really incredible - also designed by Frank Lloyd Wright, it’s very intimate in a highly stylized way, directly below the famous Rotunda. The programming is fantastic, and it’s great to be able to hear the artists speak about their work (and process!) before the final version is performed in all it’s glory.
I am always a bit surprised by the audience, though. It seems like this is the sort of thing that a younger set could really get into. There’s even a wine and food reception in the Rotunda afterwards, which the artists usually attend - amazing! And yet, it seems that the majority of the audience is almost always much older. Not that there is anything wrong with that - it just seems like there are a lot of people who might be missing out! So, if you’ve never been to a Guggenheim Works & Process event, check it out! I promise you won’t be disappointed
On that note, I’ll tell you a bit about what we saw (and heard). Before the event began, there were two dancers on stage with no music, going through movements that looked fluid and intensional, but in a free sort of way. That flow is achieved through a highly defined movement language, developed by Naharin and called GAGA (apparently he wanted to call it CACA, but friends warned him that that may not be the best choice of words). The result is interestingly human in an unexpected way.
Moderator Anna Kisselgoff started out by asking Naharin to give us all more details about GAGA. He started in a general way, speaking about efficiency of movement (like an animal moving by instinct), learning new movement habits and getting rid of old ones. letting go, surrendering, being more aware, a sense of flow and flotation, the relation of bones and flesh… he also mentioned how his interests in Thai Chi and Swimming were inspirations for this vocabulary.
One of the first demonstrations from the dancers (besides the warm-up intro while people were taking their seats) was to show the difference between movements that happen TO YOU, and ones that YOU DECIDE to make.
Naharin asked them to SHAKE. The dancers then slowly started to shake their bodies with intention, but in a very understated way. It was clear that THEY were making the shaking happen. He then asked them to QUAKE. Now you got the feeling that there was some force within them that was causing their bodies to start shaking. It was happening TO them. He explained that GAGA was a combination of things the we decide to do, and things that happen to us.
He then delved into a more detailed explanation of GAGA, explaining various terms that represent different movement ideas.
I’m probably spelling these all wrong, but hopefully you’ll get the idea (or perhaps someone who knows how these are spelled can let us know!).
The first one he talked about was LENA, which means source. It refers to the area between your navel and your groin, from which the direction of movement is created.
Then he spoke of BIBA, which stands for the stretching of the body away from the sit bones.
Another was LUNA, which represented the insides of your hands and feet and the bases of your fingers and toes.
Then ASHID, using the outer sides of your feet by moving your pelvis or knees, which echos into the rest of your body and spine. And then FASHI, the feeling of the feet being glued to the floor resulting in more movement in the joints.
OBA, which represents giving in, surrendering, and letting go, allowing you to be more explosive and quick. He spoke about explosiveness, and how it should happen at the beginning of the movement, and then you should just let go and allow it to continue. He gave the example of a grand battement, where the initial explosion should happen at the beginning, and you then allow the leg to continue up.
Also, Ella, which means 30%. He said the name came from a lazy dancer, but then clarified that he appreciates laziness, that lazy people change the world. Laziness forces you to be efficient, and prevents you from being wasteful.
And my favorite, GINA, which is about being silly. The ability to laugh at oneself is a virtue, he says. He explained it as “being available to be tickled”.
“It is not a matter of opinion. Mirrors are bad for dancers.”
He also mentioned how his dancers do not dance with mirrors… that mirrors destruct and disturb the dancers… that they take away the ability for a dancer to connect to things around them. I totally agree, although unfortunately still find it very difficult to trust what I am doing without ever having seen the movement on my body in a mirror. I suppose that is the curse of growing up as a dancer in front of mirrors - as most of us do. It is a tool, that can be helpful in some cases (imho) and harmful in others.
After hearing him speak of all these points of the GAGA movement vocabulary, it was fun to then see the dancers dance again, and be able to pick up on the things he described. You could now start to see some of the pattern of thought that was going on within these dancers, and why certain movements would follow others, or why they were appropriate. It was fantastic!
At other points during the presentation, he would have the dancers do small excerpts from the pieces that we would later see at BAM, but sometimes to different music than the music that is in the actual pieces. During the Q&A someone asked how intertwined the music and choreography were for Naharin, and he explained… Movement carves out space, and music marks time. Music can add character but is really there for keeping time. It is this fusion of different ingredients that creates something new.
It was definitely an amazing experience to see and listen to the process and thoughts of the artist in such an intimate setting, and to then see the finished piece a few nights later. I wished that my friends could have also seen the W&P presentation beforehand, as it really gave you a preparedness for paying attention to the movement, beyond even just seeing the piece as a whole. I wonder what the experience was like for the Cedar Lake dancers in exploring and then performing Naharin’s work. It would also be interesting to know how people who took his workshops around that time enjoyed the experience. I remember our friend Tonya Plank attended the workshop (click the link to see her description of it). I would have loved to have gone, but it was at a time when my hip pain was at its worst. Maybe next time… or perhaps if I find myself in Tel Aviv, I will stop by!
Recent Posts by kristin sloan
May 21, 2007 at 2:09 am · Filed under Uncategorized, dance, bam, juilliard, contemporary dance, miki orihara, MIKI
Posted by Miki Orihara
On Thursday, at the BAM, Harvey Theater, I saw Doug Varone and Dancers. “Dense Terrain” was a full evening piece. This is Doug’s first time at Brooklyn Academy of Music.
12 chairs on stage, video screen at the back, live musicians, and 12 dancers. and almost 1 and a half hours.
On Friday and Saturday, at the Juilliard Theater, I saw “Choreographic Honors Edition 2007″. 13 dance pieces on Friday, and 12 on Saturday.
On Sunday, at the Joyce theater, I saw Companhia Portuguesa De Bailado Contemporane. “Seven Bird Dreams” and “Requiem”…
and tomorrow, I will see the Senior Show Cases at the Juilliard Theater.
I am seeing so many dances this week, it is hard to remember everything, but more and more I realize what I liked about dance…. human feelings but not competition…
Inside of the Harvey Theater(BAM)
Recent Posts by miki orihara
