February 23, 2007 at 3:14 pm · Filed under modern, TONY, break dance, computer vision, dance technology, contemporary
|
| Posted by Tony Schultz
Here is another dance using my interactive time-machine system.

There has been some talk over on Great Dance about intellectual property rights as it relates to dance. Creative Commons is a beautiful thing. The idea that someone can own the rights to a dance seems absurd to me. All dance is derivative because it is about communication. The idea of owning a dance seems as silly as owning a word. The dance below quotes Viola Farber, Merce Cunningham, Christopher Williams and B-Girl Angel. Like DJ Spooky says, it is in the remixing of culture that we find something original. Feel free to steal this dance. Perform it exactly as I did if you like. Play the video however you like, just give me a shout-out, keep it intact and don’t use it to sell anything. The music Emptyness by Gahnah was also distributed under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial License.
Enjoy
Recent Posts by tony schultz
September 28, 2006 at 4:06 pm · Filed under dance, computers, studio, dancers, video, podcast, technology, vidcast, TONY, dance and technology, break dance, computer vision, sarah lawrence
|
| Posted by Tony
I have of late become obsessed with time machines. They are everywhere and my apprehension of them is expanding. In our contemporary landscape, where space is almost fully dominated, time is the frontier and battleground. Telling radical history and making radical culture shapes the future. Time machines are war machines and in the hands of both propagandists and bandits. We make them today with cameras and computers.
Cinema is a time machine. Cool thought, but others came up with it first. Bergson and Deleuze helped develop this line of thinking. One idea: images pass messages between the past and future through the present interface of memory and perception. The creation of art and culture is a mode of tele-portation and time-travel. These portals are accessed through viewership and cognition. Another idea: cinema’s control of moving images frees storytelling from the dictated velocity and chronology of time. Our modern media technologies are time machines in their capacity to stretch, cut and manipulate the time-code. This is transformative to our consciousness, interaction…and our dancing.
Time machines have become the theme of the first few weeks of my Dance and Technology class at Sarah Lawrence College. One of our first projects uses differential time rates to escape the perceptual confines of a Newtonian clockwork universe. The goal is to give dancers cinematic control over time contractions and dilations, while they are dancing. Computer vision algorithms are used to combine dancing and cinematography into a single practice. The record rate continually responds to the dancer’s input, providing equal amounts of visual flux between successive frames. If there is much action in the visual field the camera speeds up to catch it. If the dancing slows to an adagio the camera slows down too.
Have a look at what kind of visual artifact it creates and think what kind of time machine you would like to dance with.
Algorithm and Dance: Tony Schultz
Music: “Turkish” by Disco Nap

Recent Posts by tony schultz