MAIN ABOUT BOARD CONTRIB PODCAST PRESS READ SHOP CONTACT CONTACT

Archive for duchamp

Approaches to Collaboration panel: Choreographers and Visual Artists

NANCY GARCIA
NYU’s ITP
BIO | POSTS

The roundtable discussion, “Approaches to Collaboration: Choreographers and Visual Artists,” took place on Saturday, September 8th at The Philoctetes Center for the Multidisciplinary Study of Imagination at the New York Psychoanalytic Institute, on the upper east side. Collaborative models for performance were discussed.

Complete description of event and panelist bios: http://www.philoctetes.org/Event_Archive/Approaches_to_Collaboration_Choreographers_and_Visual_Artists

Following are my notes from the panel, as discussed by Noel Carroll, Roger Copeland, Mary Fleischer, Lynn Garafola, and Yvonne Rainer.

Ballet Russes’ collaborative model exemplified the Wagnerian idea of Gesamtkunswerk, or “total work of art,” via a synthesis of poetry, scenic design, staging, action, and music.

The ballet Parade was cited as a very early example of artistic collaboration, composed for Serge Diaghilev’s Ballets Russes 1916-1917. Choreography by Léonide Massine (who was also dancing), music by Erik Satie, a one-act scenario by Jean Cocteau, costumes and sets designed by Pablo Picasso, and the orchestra conducted by Ernest Ansermet. Painter Henri Matisse also did sets and costumes for another of Ballet Russes Le Chant du Rossignol 1920 (or The Song of the Nightingale).

Parade Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parade_

Apparently, George Balanchine (one of the founders of New York City Ballet), was not so interested in visual aspects such as costuming and sets, but he was interested in lighting. Another choreographer who was very involved with lighting was Louie Fuller. She is considered a pioneer of both modern dance and theatrical lighting techniques.

Info about Louie Fuller: http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/c/current-loie.html

There was a good time spent on the Cage/Cunningham collaborative model. Both artists were in favor of “disillusion,” but for different reasons.
While Cunningham is a defender of the autonomy of the art form (in his case it would be dance), Cage is more of an integrationist, a descendant of Marcel Duchamp’s ideas who also wanted to dissolve the distance between art and life. Where Cage and Cunningham agree is on strategy: the use of aleatoric methods.

Yvonne Rainer called this collaborative model “mechanical,” where there is no apparent conversation between the collaborators. She cites a piece by choreographer John Jasperse, whose name she didn’t say but because of her description I suspect she meant California, as a good example of the integration of the stage elements (that set was designed by Ammar Eloueini).
Info about John Jasperse’s California: http://www.johnjasperse.org/index.php?name=rep8 Image of Set Design by Ammar Eloueini: http://www.digit-all.net

Recent Posts by nancy garcia

To be … or not to be … that is the question | Reading Group Post V

maia_40 southafrica-flag Posted by Maia Jordaan | The Winger Reading Group

jerome-bel.jpg
Choreographer: Jérôme Bel
Production: The show must go on (2001)
Photo: Laurent Philippe

I propose livening up this Reading Group through conversation – where we all participate in defining this field. I would like to start this conversation by inviting all of you (whether you’ve read Lepecki’s Exhausting Dance or not) to share your viewpoint on this critique of representation/virtuosity through stillness and reduction…

When Jérôme Bel had one of his performers ask this question – “To be … or not to be” – in The Last Performance (1998), he set up a critique of representation. Re-Read this famous Shakespearean quote from Hamlet as:

To represent … or not to represent … that is the question in contemporary dance.

Jérôme Bel critiques representation through stillness … or reduction … as Lepecki points out in Concept and Presence (A chapter in Carter’s book Rethinking Dance History, 2004):

“The contemporary European dance scene can be qualified by one term: ‘reduction’ – of expansiveness, of the spectacular, of the unessential…”

Pirko Husemann points out “on the level of dance an evident fading-away of dance itself prevails. Contemporary European dance becomes less and less danced in the usual sense. Admittedly, this tendency within dance history is no singular occurrence – here mentioned would be only the minimalism of American 1960s postmodern dance.”

This critique of representation is certainly not new. The lineage of this rejection of virtuosity and representation includes amongst others:

Dadaist performances,
Duchamp’s conceptual art,
Brecht’s Verfremdungseffekt,
Artaud’s manifesto for a theatre of cruelty,
Performance art,
Happenings,
Installations,
Judson’s minimalism,
as well as postmodern dance in general.
It has also been theorized extensively in critical theory – Derrida; and psycho-analysis – Lacan.

What is your stance? And why?

• Listen to a discussion called “Not Conceptual” between Jonathan Burrows, Jérôme Bel, Bojana Cvejić and Xavier Le Roy.

• Watch the Last Performance lecture.

• Watch a section from The Show Must Go On (Choreographed by Jérôme Bel)

Recent Posts by maia jordaan